Leaders often focus on refining strategy, restructuring teams, and launching new initiatives. But even the most well-designed plans stall when the underlying conditions for change aren’t in place.
Our research shows that transformation success depends less on leaders’ plans, and more on whether they genuinely believe in the change. This aligns with our experience working with clients, where this gap is often rooted in a disconnect in belief. While many leaders understand the need for change, fewer are deeply convinced or able to instill that conviction across the organization, or actively create the conditions that allow change to take hold.
|
79%of leaders believe transformation is critical for their organizations long-term growth and stability
|
Russell Reynolds Associates’ Transformational Leadership Study reveals that only about one in three (29%) of leaders believe their organization has been extremely or very successful in their transformation efforts, despite a large majority (79%) of leaders agreeing that transformation is extremely or very critical to their organizations long-term growth and stability.
Perhaps one of the biggest barriers is organizational inertia. As leaders, you know better than anyone that changing the status quo—even within small portions of the business—is extremely hard. Yet, even when the right systems of transformation are in place, deeply ingrained ways of working can derail the most thoughtfully designed transformations. That’s why creating the conditions for change is such an important leadership responsibility.
MethodologyDrawing from dozens of interviews with CEOs and using survey data from our 2025 Transformational Leadership Survey with over 1,000 executives—CEOs, C-suite leaders, and next-generation leaders (one to two levels below the C-suite)—we identified 27 organizational dimensions spanning culture, talent, structure, hierarchy, and communication that influence transformation outcomes. Next, via our survey, we gathered data on how leaders scored their organizations on these dimensions. Using a factor analysis—a common statistical technique for detecting common themes within data—we isolated eight distinct factors, or conditions for change. We then conducted a relative importance analysis to link these conditions for change to transformation outcomes. Transformation outcomes were determined by leaders’ rating of their organization’s transformation efforts on a 5-point scale from ‘not at all successful’ to ‘extremely successful.’ |
By linking the conditions for change to transformation’s outcomes, a clear pattern emerged. While all eight factors play important roles, three consistently have a disproportionate impact on success. Together, they account for more than half (56%) of the difference between transformations that stall and those that deliver lasting results.
Figure 1: The eight organizational conditions needed for transformation—and the three that stand above the rest
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates 2025 Transformational Leadership Survey
Figure 2: Relative impact of factors on transformation success
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates 2025 Transformational Leadership Survey | Among CEOs, C-level leaders, and next-gen leaders (n=1,245) | Note: This analysis shows which factors are most influential relative to others. Lower-ranked items may still matter—they simply exert less relative impact in this context.
Ela Buczynska is a member of RRA’s Center for Leadership Insight. She is based in Chicago.
Bob Marcus is a senior member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Leadership Advisory practice. He is based in New York.
Sean Dineen is a senior member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Leadership Advisory practice. He is based in Boston.