ja-JP
ログイン
Your board faces no greater responsibility than selecting your next CEO. When handled strategically, CEO succession can propel your organization to new heights. When mismanaged, it can trigger market uncertainty, leadership gaps, and strategic drift that may take years to overcome.
In an era where CEO tenure continues to shrink and stakeholder expectations keep rising, boards must approach succession not as an event but as an ongoing strategic imperative that demands continuous attention and thoughtful preparation.
The urgency: A proactive approach to CEO succession is your board's most powerful risk management tool
Poor succession planning represents a significant governance failure that can trigger immediate market penalties, executive team instability, and strategic drift. Organizations with sudden, unplanned CEO departures often experience share price decline while those with transparent, robust succession plans demonstrate greater resilience during transitions.
4月 20, 2026 5 ～分で読めます
4月 20, 2026 7 ～分で読めます
4月 20, 2026 5 ～分で読めます
Frequently asked questions
What does CEO succession planning mean for boards?
CEO succession planning is the strategic process through which boards identify, assess, and prepare potential candidates to assume the chief executive role. It involves ongoing evaluation of leadership requirements, development of internal talent, and assessment of external options to ensure organizational continuity and strategic alignment during leadership transitions.
How long should CEO succession planning take boards?
Effective CEO succession is a continuous process rather than a time-bound event. Best-practice boards and organizations maintain ongoing succession planning with more intensive candidate assessment and selection typically beginning 18-24 months before an anticipated transition. Emergency succession protocols should be continuously maintained regardless of anticipated timing.
Should boards consider internal candidates, external candidates, or both?
Most successful CEO transitions involve consideration of both internal and external talent. Internal candidates bring organizational knowledge and continuity, while external candidates offer fresh perspectives and specialized experience. The right balance depends on your strategic priorities.