Leadership/#Disrupted

This paper is the first of a four-part series that explores the growing importance of innovation leadership and inclusive leadership in banking. It is based on a study of over six thousand senior executives carried out over the past four years and provides new perspectives on these indicators of forward-thinking leadership.

Part 1. Key findings

Part 2. Changing how to analyze and develop talent

Part 3. A new lens for identifying talent

Part 4. Mobility and cross-fertilization

Dataset composition

Total: 6,111 executives

Gender: 4,417 male and 1,496 female executives

Leaders: 626 CEOs, 1,744 CxOs

Regions: 2,526 EMEA, 2,437 Americas, 940 Asia Pacific

Sector: 1,386 Financial Services, including 689 Banking

Disruption is accelerating

A new generation of banking leaders are being defined by their ability to respond quickly to multiple forces that are disrupting traditional leadership agendas:

Addressing these themes in banking

We are being asked to find banking leaders who can cope with these demands, who can manage a complex global business in a sustainable manner, stay ahead of the curve and innovate, and remain inclusive, capitalizing on diversity of thoughts and opinions.

Through studies of best-in-class innovation leaders and inclusive leaders, our organizational psychologists mapped the competencies demonstrated by top-performing leaders who are successfully adapting to these evolving demands.

Benchmarking these across our large executive assessment dataset has given us valuable insights into how firms can improve internal development programs, out-of-industry hiring, and internal talent-spotting to build future-proofed executive pipelines.

A powerful competency combination

Our research showed that innovation leadership is closely correlated with inclusive leadership. In particular, there are common competencies across both that relate to driving sustainable organizational change.

Delivering improved performance

Market studies highlight the impact that innovation and inclusion have on company performance.

This is an opportunity for competitive advantage

The industry benchmark below highlights how, compared to companies in other sectors, many banks are lagging in their ability to lead innovation at an organizational level and build inclusive working environments.

For those banks that can instill effective leadership across these two factors, there is an opportunity for them to gain a significant competitive advantage over their peers given the relative immaturity of the broader sector.

Demand for these competencies is increasing

The intense demand for senior executives with innovation and inclusive leadership competencies has driven average executive scores across these two metrics significantly higher over the past four years.

For many organizations these skills and behaviors are no longer seen as peripheral, they are now core to what is considered a modern, forward-thinking leader.

Banking has seen an even faster increase in demand for these competencies, albeit from a lower base.

To catch up with higher-performing sectors, the questions banks need to answer include:

Breaking the cycle

Banking’s low scores here pose a challenge: How do you develop your talent in a low inclusion and low innovation environment?

By not indexing on the competencies that underpin these two factors, you risk continuously stripping your talent pipeline of people with a desire to take risks or who are willing to innovate and break silos.

This increases the likelihood that subsequent generations will continue to make the same mistakes as their predecessors.

Given the impact of disruptive forces on the industry, including lower barriers to entry, this represents a material threat to banks and financial institutions. They will struggle to evolve and stay relevant in an increasingly competitive landscape, and bold decisions are needed to break this vicious cycle.

Three recommended solutions

In the next three papers in this series, we will explore three sets of solutions:

By exploring the underlying competencies and behaviors impacting these results, as well as those from other industries, how can you best adapt your approach to developing your senior executives?

Given that other industries can be a fertile source of innovation and inclusive leadership talent, how can banking effectively absorb these leaders without transplant rejection?

Appendix: Methodology

Changing how we measure potential

The methodology was developed by our in-house psychologists in partnership with Hogan Assessments. It is based on studies of “best-in-class” senior leaders, mapped to a 95 percent confidence interval, and synthetically validated against a dataset of 5.5 million executives.

Consultant Authors

Mary Caroline Tillman 

James Diggines

Chris Davis

Claire-Louise McSherry

Tina Shah-Paikeday

Sean Dineen

David Lange

Jane Bird 

Bennett Hanig 

Robert Voth

Pam Attinger 

Sophie Saeed 

Mark Temple leads Knowledge for Russell Reynolds Associates’ Financial Services Sector. He is based in London.