The Russell Reynolds Associates database—unique in that it contains more than 5,000 data points from the top ranks of corporations worldwide—allows us to make statistically driven observations about the characteristics possessed by leaders in a particular field.
Our methodology was straightforward: We compared 78 top legal executives with our broader database of executives (as well as with CEOs and other executive figures) on 60 psychometric scales from well-validated leadership assessments to understand upon which scales the top legal executives showed statistical differences from the other populations.
Beyond their fulcrum role as a key member of the leadership team and savvy board advisor, three external forces have put pressure on the general counsel position to be increasingly proactive and agile:
When we examined best-in-class general counsel against their peers, three key differences emerged. The highest performers are 18% more decisive than their executive peers—immune to “analysis paralysis.” They also are at home in the spotlight and 18% more likely to display dynamic leadership. Finally, they are a whopping 36% more likely to cut through bureaucracy—a striking trait given the stereotype of GC as upholders of rules and regulations.
When we examined top legal executives against a roster of lawyer stereotypes, most of the stereotypes proved false. The group scored statistically identically to the general population on most traits.
Within the realm of commonly stereotyped traits, top legal executives in fact show only two statistically significant differences from the overall executive population.
General counsel sit at an interesting place within the C-suite spectrum of personalities. They are not change agents/disruptors (like chief digital officers, chief marketing officers and chief information officers/chief technology officers (CIO/CTO) or even change enablers (like CEOs, chief human resources officers and chief operating officers). Rather, they are at the more pragmatic, business-oriented end of the risk management group, though not as rules driven as CFOs. This unique position among their colleagues gives them the opportunity to be the balancing voice in key conversations.
The complexity and breadth of the regulatory challenges require that top GC display the uncanny ability to cut through and find solutions that both protect and advance the corporation in what often is a sea of gray judgment calls. The GC has to bridge the risk tolerance of the corporation with the threats facing the organization and define a path forward. Judgment, pragmatism, great gut instincts, agility and people skills all are top requirements for success.
General counsel often act as pragmatic forces within the C-suite, and their leadership and behavioral attributes bear out this view. Perhaps not surprisingly given the rigors of legal training and skills development, this group is introspective and solution seeking. What makes them effective partners to their colleagues, though, is their strong team orientation and laser focus on the task at hand.
Compared with CEOs, presidents and general managers (GM) (effectively, leaders in more explicitly commercial roles), general counsel scored both lower and higher on key commercial traits.
Additional Authors:
Melissa Swift is the firm’s Global Knowledge Leader for Leadership & Succession. She is based in New York.
Jean Van Den Eynde conducts general counsel searches for the European region from his home base in the Brussels office.
Laila Abou-Rahme conducts general counsel searches for the Americas region from her home base in the New York office.
Joe Karsay conducts general counsel searches for the Asia/Pacific region from his home base in the Hong Kong office.
Suzana Kertesz conducts general counsel searches for the Americas region from her home base in the São Paulo office.
Lynn Lapierre conducts general counsel searches for the Americas region from her home base in the New York office.
Jennie O´Connell conducts general counsel searches for the European region from her home base in the London office.
Analysis was conducted by Erin Marie Conklin.